The P/E ratio measures how cheaply valued a company’s stock price is by dividing the current stock price to its earnings-per-share (EPS). It indicates the dollar amount an investor can expect to invest in a company to receive $1 of that company’s earnings. Chinese Estates Holdings P/E ratio is 5.38. it has increased by a third in comparison to the same period last year. this metric is one of the most popular because it easily summarizes the status of the company. however, in order to make an informed decision, more metrics should be analysed. Let’s dive into Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/E ratio
What is Chinese Estates Holdings P/E Ratio?
The P/E ratio of Chinese Estates Holdings is 5.38, which represents a 9.13% increase over the same period last year. their average P / E ratio is 10.43 and their 5-year average is 6.7.
What is Chinese Estates Holdings Net EPS?
The net EPS of Chinese Estates Holdings for the most recent quarter was 0.41 US dollars, which represents a 18.0% decrease from the same period last year.
Who are Chinese Estates Holdings Competitors?
Based on Jika.io AI model, OCI International Holdings, Oshidori International Holdings, Kingston Financial Group, Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group, China Renaissance Holdings, Dhunseri Ventures, Futu Holdings, Geojit Financial Services are considered to be Chinese Estates Holdings’s competitors because the companies operate within the same industry as Chinese Estates Holdings and are targeting the same customer base. in addition, competitors typically share a similar market capitalization as Chinese Estates Holdings.
Who is Chinese Estates Holdings’s Biggest competitor?
The biggest competitor of Chinese Estates Holdings is OCI International Holdings, based on the Jika.io AI model. it has a similar market capitalization to Chinese Estates Holdings in the industry, it dominates a similar share of the market as Chinese Estates Holdings, and it provides and markets very similar services.
What industry is Chinese Estates Holdings in?
Chinese Estates Holdings is part of the Capital Markets and Financial Services industry.
Chinese Estates Holdings vs OCI International Holdings
Market Cap: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Market Cap of 4253992448 is lower than OCI International Holdings Market Cap of 5144142848.
Average Volume: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Average Volume of 270992.0 is higher than OCI International Holdings Average Volume of 1.2M.
Beta: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Beta of 1.09 is higher than OCI International Holdings Beta of -0.01.
Revenue: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Revenue of 1.3B is lower than OCI International Holdings Revenue of 73.232M.
Net Income: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Net Income of -3.515B is higher than OCI International Holdings Net Income of -122.622M.
Gross Profit: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Gross Profit of 1.017B is lower than OCI International Holdings Gross Profit of 1.441M.
Ebitda: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Ebitda of -3.391B is higher than OCI International Holdings Ebitda of -108.507M.
P/E Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/E Ratio of 5.39 is higher than OCI International Holdings P/E Ratio of -37.51.
P/S Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/S Ratio of 7.89 is higher than OCI International Holdings P/S Ratio of 35.8.
P/B Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/B Ratio of 0.3 is lower than OCI International Holdings P/B Ratio of 9.75.
P/FCF Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/FCF Ratio of -4.88 is higher than OCI International Holdings P/FCF Ratio of -15.28.
ROE: Chinese Estates Holdings’s ROE of 0.03 is higher than OCI International Holdings ROE of -0.25.
ROA: Chinese Estates Holdings’s ROA of 0.04 is higher than OCI International Holdings ROA of -0.18.
Return On Capital Employed: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.02 is lower than OCI International Holdings Return On Capital Employed of 0.15.
Gross Profit Margin: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.95 is higher than OCI International Holdings Gross Profit Margin of 0.91.
Chinese Estates Holdings vs Oshidori International Holdings
Market Cap: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Market Cap of 4253992448 is higher than Oshidori International Holdings Market Cap of 2901898240.
Average Volume: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Average Volume of 270992.0 is lower than Oshidori International Holdings Average Volume of 673370.0.
Beta: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Beta of 1.09 is higher than Oshidori International Holdings Beta of 0.85.
Revenue: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Revenue of 1.3B is higher than Oshidori International Holdings Revenue of -3.102B.
Net Income: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Net Income of -3.515B is higher than Oshidori International Holdings Net Income of -3.146B.
Gross Profit: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Gross Profit of 1.017B is higher than Oshidori International Holdings Gross Profit of -3.131B.
Ebitda: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Ebitda of -3.391B is lower than Oshidori International Holdings Ebitda of -3.492B.
P/E Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/E Ratio of 5.39 is higher than Oshidori International Holdings P/E Ratio of -7.67.
P/S Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/S Ratio of 7.89 is lower than Oshidori International Holdings P/S Ratio of 9.78.
P/B Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/B Ratio of 0.3 is lower than Oshidori International Holdings P/B Ratio of 0.48.
P/FCF Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/FCF Ratio of -4.88 is lower than Oshidori International Holdings P/FCF Ratio of -7.04.
ROE: Chinese Estates Holdings’s ROE of 0.03 is higher than Oshidori International Holdings ROE of -0.04.
ROA: Chinese Estates Holdings’s ROA of 0.04 is higher than Oshidori International Holdings ROA of -0.06.
Return On Capital Employed: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.02 is lower than Oshidori International Holdings Return On Capital Employed of 0.04.
Gross Profit Margin: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.95 is higher than Oshidori International Holdings Gross Profit Margin of 0.82.
Chinese Estates Holdings vs Kingston Financial Group
Market Cap: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Market Cap of 4253992448 is higher than Kingston Financial Group Market Cap of 4045928448.
Average Volume: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Average Volume of 270992.0 is higher than Kingston Financial Group Average Volume of 124271.0.
Beta: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Beta of 1.09 is lower than Kingston Financial Group Beta of 1.19.
Revenue: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Revenue of 1.3B is lower than Kingston Financial Group Revenue of 2.056B.
Net Income: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Net Income of -3.515B is lower than Kingston Financial Group Net Income of 56.253M.
Gross Profit: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Gross Profit of 1.017B is lower than Kingston Financial Group Gross Profit of 1.633B.
Ebitda: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Ebitda of -3.391B is lower than Kingston Financial Group Ebitda of 462.123M.
P/E Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/E Ratio of 5.39 is lower than Kingston Financial Group P/E Ratio of 8.03.
P/S Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/S Ratio of 7.89 is higher than Kingston Financial Group P/S Ratio of 1.54.
P/B Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/B Ratio of 0.3 is higher than Kingston Financial Group P/B Ratio of 0.19.
P/FCF Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/FCF Ratio of -4.88 is lower than Kingston Financial Group P/FCF Ratio of 1.69.
ROE: Chinese Estates Holdings’s ROE of 0.03 is higher than Kingston Financial Group ROE of 0.02.
ROA: Chinese Estates Holdings’s ROA of 0.04 is higher than Kingston Financial Group ROA of 0.02.
Return On Capital Employed: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.02 is lower than Kingston Financial Group Return On Capital Employed of 0.08.
Gross Profit Margin: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.95 is higher than Kingston Financial Group Gross Profit Margin of 0.74.
Chinese Estates Holdings vs Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group
Market Cap: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Market Cap of 4253992448 is higher than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group Market Cap of 2393192960.
Average Volume: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Average Volume of 270992.0 is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group Average Volume of 954984.0.
Beta: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Beta of 1.09 is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group Beta of 1.42.
Revenue: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Revenue of 1.3B is higher than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group Revenue of 1.285B.
Net Income: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Net Income of -3.515B is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group Net Income of 703.905M.
Gross Profit: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Gross Profit of 1.017B is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group Gross Profit of 1.132B.
Ebitda: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Ebitda of -3.391B is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group Ebitda of 1.136B.
P/E Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/E Ratio of 5.39 is higher than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group P/E Ratio of 3.71.
P/S Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/S Ratio of 7.89 is higher than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group P/S Ratio of 2.77.
P/B Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/B Ratio of 0.3 is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group P/B Ratio of 1.09.
P/FCF Ratio: Chinese Estates Holdings’s P/FCF Ratio of -4.88 is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group P/FCF Ratio of 1.06.
ROE: Chinese Estates Holdings’s ROE of 0.03 is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group ROE of 0.24.
ROA: Chinese Estates Holdings’s ROA of 0.04 is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group ROA of 0.04.
Return On Capital Employed: Chinese Estates Holdings’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.02 is lower than Bright Smart Securities & Commodities Group Return On Capital Employed of 0.23.
About Chinese Estates Holdings
The Chinese Estates Group (the “Group”) is one of the leading property developers in Hong Kong. Chinese Estates Holdings Limited is the holding company of the Group and is publicly listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with the stock code: 127. The core business of Chinese Estates is property investment for rental and property development for sale. the group focuses primarily on Hong Kong and diversifies its property interests to mainland China and the United Kingdom. the Group’s investment properties include retail and office assets. most of the investment properties of Chinese Estates are highly accessible and strategically located in prime commercial areas in Hong Kong, such as Causeway Bay and Wanchai. in mainland China, Chinese Estates owns a five-star international hotel in Beijing. in the United Kingdom, Chinese Estates owns four investment properties in London. over the past twenty years, Chinese Estates has built a reputation for conceiving and implementing redevelopment, renovation and repackaging programmes to increase the value and revenue of its investment properties. Chinese Estates specializes in developing high-end commercial and residential projects. a number of quality and cosmopolitan residential properties are being developed for sale.
